7. Looking back at
your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from
it to the full product?
At the start
of our preliminary task, we began with discussing initial ideas from our group about
the basic storyline plot, genre and actors involved. Since this was our first
planning session, we found that our ideas were very basic and not original, we
based our ideas on what we’ve already seen and experienced watching thrillers
in the cinema. For example, our first idea was to create an action thriller
(the first thriller we thought of is The Expendables), in which involved mis en
scene such as guns but later on we found out that in order to make a
action/thriller realistic, we would need a higher budget and more experience in
film making. In the end, our genre was a comedy/thriller in which the setting
was in the small kitchen of our college. As you can see the ideas are very
basic.
Comparing the
planning stage of the preliminary task to my final project, in our final
project we generated more realistic, complex and original ideas even though we
used some intertexuality, we added our own thoughts to it such as using the
setting in the “Under croft” so we could get access with the dangerous weapons
(Hammers, blades, saws and wooden bats) we needed. We got our intertexuality
from doing massive research which benefitted us. In the Prelim we used
intertexuality from the top of our heads as we tried to remember thrillers we
have watched in the past. We did little research than we did in our final
project and this is why the complexity of our final project is greater. I have
learnt that doing research which is relevant to your product has a massive
effect in your final idea, in that case, the more research you do, the better
the ideas on planning and the final product itself.
Planning is very important as we can see this, we made a production schedule for our final product. We did not plan a production schedule for our prelim.
Prelim genre: Thriller/Comedy. During our making of
the sub genre of comedy, we found it very difficult therefore we changed the
genre. We found out that the certain genres are more difficult to create than
others (E.g. a comedy needs good acting).
Final product genre: Thriller/horror. Relying on the
experience of creating the prelim, we found out that our acting skills is one
of our weaknesses, so we chose a genre that will rely mostly on cinematography
to create tension rather than facial expressions. Therefore we chose a
Thriller/Horror; also I have had experience with making a horror title sequence
in secondary school in which I used some of my knowledge there also.
Here is the comparison between our
preliminary storyboard to our final product storyboard:
As you can
see, the final product of our storyboard contains more detail than the
preliminary storyboard. The cinematography we discussed in our planning of our
final product, we used our knowledge from our prelim and we built on that, we
added extra cinematography shots such as panning shots and tilt shots to show
movement of an individual. It also looks more professional than a medium shot
alone.
Here is the similarity shots between our Prelim and our Final Title Sequence:
During our
prelim, we struggled with using the cameras as this is the first time we
properly used it. We took time to auto focus the shots and to keep the camera
steady in our hands. Over the course, we managed to use the cameras safely and
properly using all its components (auto-focus, setting up with tripod and zoom
in/out).
Here is the comparison between a
non-autofocus shot from our prelim and our auto focused shot from our final
product:

We did not
any lighting equipment for our prelim, and we found out that some of our shots
were dark and we couldn’t see it properly, it made our production look
unprofessional. We took this in to notice for our final product and we used
lighting equipment.
Here is the comparison between our
non used light shot in our prelim and our used light equipment shot in our
final product:
The 180 degree rule, we applied it both successfully in
our prelim and our final product. We were shown how important this was by our
teachers.The 180 degree rule claims that when filming, the camera should stay on one side of an imagery line.

Using sound
is an important component in keeping the thrill moving throughout the title
sequence, as in our prelim, we uploaded our title sequence to our blog (without
sound), and got comments from our peers saying that it would be improved if we
added non-diegetic sounds. We then added sound and got better comments. We took
the comments into account and we applied it to our final title sequence. Using
non-diegetic sounds is used in every single title sequence we have researched
on YouTube. Soundtrack Pro made this possible for us to create our sounds. The
type of sound used in our prelim is an excitement type, using fast paced drum
kit, bass and electric guitar sounds to create that excitement thrill as the
genre was a Comedy/thriller. However, we interpreted this as an opposite in
which our genre was a thriller/horror, we had to use tension type of thrill
rather than excitement so we used dark sounds such as violins and orchestra
sounds. From this experience of using sound, we found out that choosing the
right non diegetic sounds that suits the genre is what makes the film successful.
During our
course of the project, we reminded ourselves that we were making a film opening
title sequence, so the titles are very important. We didn’t follow proper
conventions in our prelim, in which we made up the production ident,
distribution ident and companies. However in our final product, we researched
real production/distribution companies in which we researched the ones that
will fit our style of making e.g. our project was low budget therefore it would
be meaningful that we were distributed by an independent company (which
supports real low budget films) and would be unrealistic if we were distributed
by a conglomerate like Disney. We superimposed our titles for production/distribution ident but in our real title sequence we used a programme called Motion which gave our production ident a movement image in which it looks professional rather than a normal text ident. The skills I have learnt is to use different types of programmes.
My editing
skills improved upon from editing the prelim to my final title sequence. From
the prelim I learnt how to put basic titles on the screen, also how to
superimpose it on top of a playing clip. However in my final title sequence
edit, I used the same skills but also learnt how to change the font of the
text, and how to make sure that each title remained in the wireframe zone so it
does not look out of position.
Here are some of our title sequences in for our prelim compared to our final product title sequence:
Overall, from
across the two productions, I have learnt major skills in film making which
consist of using expensive media equipment safely, editing, filming, and how to
improve upon skills using knowledge and experience from past work (prelim to
final product).